Crypto

Vitalik says rollups can lose billions if security is not proven before decentralizing

The co-founder of Ethereum, Vitalik Buerin, has issued a striking warning to developers of L2 Systems Systems based on Rollup, stressing that the precipitation to decentralize without robust security measures could cause catastrophic financial losses

In a post X, the Ethereum co-founder noted This realization of step 2 in a L2 network is essential for safety; However, he said it was just as vital to strengthen the underlying evidence system. He added that rushing to stage 2 without considerably improving the reliability of the evidence could in fact increase the chances of failure.

One of Buterin's concern is that many rollers are still based on centralized control mechanisms, “training wheels”, as he described. Although useful to help roll the ball, they can also become unique failure points that hinder progress, unless they are replaced by robust and decentralized alternatives.

He stressed that rollups are vulnerable to attacks and operational failures without appropriate security measures such as evidence of fraud or validity, threatening the confidence of users and harming the wider Ethereum ecosystem.

Daniel Wang suggests adding a “bats” label to layer 2 roll-ups

The Buterin position came in response to the suggestion of the founder and CEO Daniel Wang to have a separate label for the 2 -Batteetested stadium – for better security.

The CEO of Loopring assertive That a roll-up could be classified as regrouping if its code has been on Mainnet d'Ethereum For more than six months and maintained a TVL of $ 100 million, including at least $ 50 million in Ethereum and a major stable.

He also proposed that the battery status is not permanent – any modification made to the Rollup should require it to go through the qualification process again to recover the label.

Again, it doesn't matter if a roll-up was in stage 2 or not; A roll-up could still qualify for the battle label.

Responding to Wang's proposal, Buterin pointed out: “A good reminder that step 2 is not the only thing that counts for security: the quality of the underlying evidence system is also important.”

Dominick John, analyst at Kronos Research, also argued that a system becomes really decentralized when it can prove reliable under economic stress and not only through conceptions of theoretical evidence.

He added that before going from step 1 to step 2, the Rollup teams must also prepare for the risks they will face which will threaten the security of the network.

Buterin: Rollups should only reach step 2 with solid evidence systems

In another post X, Buterin elaborate at the best time to spend step 2 in a mathematical model.

In his model, he made the following assumptions: each member of the Security Council has a failure rate of 10%, the failure of liveliness and the failure of security are also likely, the security council of stadium 0 is 4 out of 7 and stadium 1 is 6 out of 8.

Given these hypotheses, it argued that when the quality of the evidence increases, the optimal step goes from step 0 to step 1 and possibly in step 2.. This means that steps 0 or 1 are more reliable when the default probabilities increase that stage 2. Consequently, progressing to step 2 is only appropriate when your proof system is reliable.

With these hypotheses, he said that when the evidence system is strengthened, the cutting -edge level will go from step 0 to step 1, then from step 2.. Consequently, steps 0 or 1 are more reliable as the probability of failure increases compared to stage 2. Thus, you should not go to phase 2 if you have a reliable system of evidence.

He also suggested that the use of multi-sigs testing systems would reduce the probability of system degradation.

In addition, Mike Tiutin, director of technology of the Purefi decentralized conformity protocol, offered his point of view on the subject, with the conviction that you could compromise the security of your system by decentralizing prematurely.

In the same vein, the analyst of Kronos John argued that decentralization should not be considered as a race but a shared responsibility of the cryptographic ecosystem. In step 1, the advice can intervene to help if the system breaks, but in step 2, a step of step would involve millions of dollars, he said.

Cryptopolitan Academy: tired of market swings? Find out how Defi can help you create a stable passive income. Register

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button