Trump's attack on Harvard to block international students raises fears of California campuses

Washington – A multi -UN -PRIMPONT assault on the Trump administration against the oldest university in the country intended on Friday when Harvard continued to prevent the government from disengaging registrations for international students, and a judge made an immediate order to stop the ban.

Rapid legal action is the last of the Trump administration's latest attacks on the University because he says Harvard has failed to join his requests to combat anti -Semitism.

But the rabbit shot felt by Harvard international students has repercussions far beyond Cambridge, Massachusetts, as university leaders and foreign students in the United States and California, with an increasing alarm on the way in which federal actions will affect the foreign student population of 1.1 million countries-6% of American inscriptions on higher education.

Campuses have been on alert since last month, when the internal and state security services have canceled thousands of registration and visas certifications in dozens of American colleges, including the UCLA, for people who often had minor offenses such as traffic tickets. The government, seeing losses in court, subsequently reached these cancellations and was prevented from undertaking them when a federal judge based in Oakland published an injunction on Thursday.

“The current state of mind of the international community is uncertainty,” said Syed Tamim Ahmad, a UCLA junior from India and recently completed his mandate as a student representative of student government students.

Ahmad, who recently took the MCAT and plans to apply for the Faculty of Medicine, said that he was recupeting if he was pursering his studies in the United States was a safe option.

“We don't know what to expect or what come and then,” he said. “Each student has seen what happened in Harvard and was absolutely shocked. We wonder, what happens if this happens at the UCLA or another university? ”

Adam Tfayli, Senior of the UCLA, a double American-Lebanese citizen who grew up in Beirut, had a different vision. “My friends from Harvard are very worried at the moment,” said Tfayli, who has finished his mandate this week as a undergraduate student. Chairman of the Council. “At the UCLA, it's tense just because it has been on university campuses for months under this administration, but does not feel as bad as when people's visas were revoked last month.”

In a press release, the vice-chancellor of UCLA strategic communications, Mary Osako, said that “international Bruins are an essential element of our community”.

“We recognize that recent developments in other universities have created great uncertainty and anxiety, and we remain determined to support the ability of all Bruins to work, learn, teach and prosper here at the UCLA,” said Osako.

The USC, which houses 17,000 international students – most of any school in California – refused to respond to events in Harvard and underlined the Times to the declarations of its International Services Office Website on foreign students. “New restrictions could be implemented with little notice. The decision to travel internationally should be taken carefully,” said a letter this month.

As with Harvard, government representatives also examined the USC for the registration of Chinese students, who, according to them, could be a security threat – an accusation that also occurred in the colleges of California during the first Trump administration. Internal security secretary Kristi Noem, who accused Harvard of not having protected Jewish students in the midst of pro-Palestinian demonstrations, accused University on Thursday of “coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on his campus”.

In March, a chamber commission wrote to the USC to request data on Chinese nationals and their “involvement in the research funded by the federal government and the security of sensitive technologies developed on the campus”.

The USC said on Friday in a statement that it “cooperates with requests from the limited committee and followed all the applicable laws on confidentiality and other legal protections”.

Speaking on Fox News Noem said on Thursday that actions against Harvard were a “warning” to the country's universities.

“This should be a warning to all other universities to bring together your act,” she said. “Gather your act.”

The case amplifies an increasingly existential struggle for Harvard, one of the most prestigious establishments in higher education in the country. The Trump administration has launched multiple university surveys, has moved to freeze nearly $ 3 billion in federal funding and prompted its tax exemption status. Overall, federal actions raise fundamental questions about Harvard's ability to maintain its international standards.

Harvard allegedly allegedly allegedly allegedly alleged the movements of the Trump Administration “the Government's act from Harvard to reject its first amendments to reject the government's requests to control Harvard governance, the study program and” ideology “of its faculty and students.”

The “pernicious” actions of the administration, according to Harvard, would prevent some of the world's greatest minds from pursuing research and diplomas at university. Already, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology has offered the “unconditional” acceptance of international students forced to leave the Boston region due to Trump policies.

The judge of the American district court Allison D. Burroughs, appointed by former president Obama, granted an immediate restriction order, agreeing with the Harvard argument that the Trump directive would cause “immediate and irreparable damage” to the institution.

In a declaration to the Times, Abigail Jackson, a spokesperson for the White House, rejected the judicial injunction of the Massachusetts.

“The American people elected President Trump – not random local judges with their own liberal agenda – to lead the country,” said Jackson. “These non -elected judges do not have the right to prevent the Trump administration from exercising their legitimate control over immigration policy and national security policy.”

The assault of the Trump administration against higher education did not focus only on Harvard, but on a large part of the Ivy League and other elite campuses, including Columbia University, several UC, USC and Stanford campuses. Columbia and UCLA in particular became a focal point last year when demonstrations against the War of Israel against Hamas in the Gaza campuses.

A joint working group to combat anti-Semitism established by Trump sent Harvard a letter last month demanding the ideology of the university police on campus and expel the students he deems “anti-American”. Harvard also continued these requests, which calls them a violation of freedom of expression.

Discussing the legal struggle with journalists from the oval office, Trump noted that “billions of dollars were paid in Harvard”.

“How ridiculous is it?” He asked. “Harvard will have to change his habits.”

The same working group also distinguished UCLA, USC and UC Berkeley. Although the campuses were subjected to hundreds of millions of dollars in cancellation of federal subsidies which affected a large band of American universities, they did not see the targeted federal financing fires which took place in Harvard and Columbia.

However, California universities – anticipating less federal support overall – have recently established job gels and budget cuts. They also promised to fight against the anti -Semitism allegations of the campus and were criticized that they gave unequal treatment to the allegations of bias against the activists of Muslim and Arab students.