The billionaire Bill Ackman spent days after the presidential debate of the ABC to promote false allegations according to which a “denunciator” discovered the collusion between ABC and the campaign of Kamala Harris. Now, a month and several refusals later, he sees affirmations differently.
“It seems quite clear that the alleged @ABC History of denunciation debate claiming that @Kamalaharris We received questions in advance and other advantages were a false ”, Ackman poster On X alongside a blog article by Megyn Kelly discussing questionable affirmations.
Whatkman, CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, did not recognize, however, was that he was one of the first Boosters of Falsehood. After an X account named “Black Insurrectionnist” said he had been in contact with a denunciator who alleged that the Harris campaign had received debate subjects before the force test with Donald Trump and demanded Trump – and Trump alone – in fact verified.
The complaint was then published on X by the main report, a website that has repeatedly shared a disinformation on everything, from politicians to networks. It was this position that landed on Ackman's radar, which prompted it to share it with its 1.4 million followers. “If that turns out to be true, it is a serious violation of journalistic ethics and a death kick @Abcnetwork reputation, “he wrote at the time.
But the network had already rejected the allegations of questions. However, Bill Ackman publishes, and he published a lot on X. And for five days after the debate, he proceeded to complaint of his only obsession.
Once the “black insurrectionist” story shared the “affidavit”, strongly expurgated, the alleged denomator would have written, Ackman double In an open letter of September 15 at the CEO of Disney, Bob Iger, on X.
“I find the allegations credible as written,” wrote Ackman, imploring Iger to investigate the question.
“Our democracy depends on transparency, in particular events that can have an impact on the outcome of the presidential election,” added Ackman.
But now, a month later, Ackman recognized what was obvious from the start: the statements were false.
A spokesperson for Pershing Square refused to comment.
