Bill O'Reilly underlines what the '60 minutes' ignored about the glorified lawyer in the last successful play Trump – Twitchy
This has been a record year so far for “60 minutes”, perhaps crowned by an EMMY appointment for the exceptional edition (this should be “the misleading edition”) of their interview with Kamala Harris.
The Sunday evening information program CBS is also taken on the occasion of mentioning certain information that they do not seem to think that their viewers must know. A recent example was an interview of “60 minutes” with a USAID worker who told the heartbreaking story on the Doge cuts. The producers of this segment did not think it was important to mention that the random worker of the USAID was the Samantha Power speech editor.
Yesterday, brought more hacking “60 minutes” in this segment::
News -Magazine magazine has spoke with lawyers and companies that have been targeted by Trump by scanning decrees aimed at cutting them from the federal government – even if it was “almost impossible to put who
But they found a lawyer ready to go to the camera, and his name is Marc Elias:
Another Sunday, another @ 60 minutes Struck on Trump of Scott Pelley, this time, centered on the grievances of a far-left militant lawyer: Marc “Elias and others warn that Trump's assault on the legal profession threatens the rule of law itself. Elias says that, for him, he … pic.twitter.com/0caigye
– Brent Baker 🇺🇲🇺🇦 🇮🇱 (@brentbaker) May 4, 2025
Recommended
Bill O'Reilly could not help noticing what “60 minutes” did not seem to think that it was worth mentioning about Elias:
I just looked at another successful anti-Trump play over 60 minutes. Without debating the merits of President Trump using his power to punish the law firms he does not like, I will point out that the CBS correspondent, Scott Pelley, glorified a lawyer named Marc Elias who worked for the Clinton campaign …
– Bill O'Reilly (@billoreilly) May 4, 2025
“60 minutes” didn't think it was worth mentioning? We could not be less surprised.
Here is the full message of @Billoreilly:
I just looked at another successful anti-Trump play over 60 minutes. Without debating the merits of President Trump using his power to punish the law firms he does not like, I will point out that The CBS correspondent, Scott Pelley, glorified a lawyer named Marc Elias who worked for the Clinton campaign in 2016 and was up to his eyeballs in the history of Russian collusion. In one way or another, Scott did not mention this. He also did not present a pro-Trump lawyer but used three critical lawyers with regard to the president. It is false and 60 minutes must know it. Again, I don't plead that. Trump can be wrong. But CBS News has once again presented the complete story of their jihad against Donald Trump. Shame on them. More on the news without spin on Monday.
They did not present the complete story and we are certainly not shocked.
How do you quote Marc Elias as a legitimate source on something involving legal ethics? https://t.co/1edktykmd
– Mark Hemingway (@heminator) May 5, 2025
When you are the “journalists” at “60 minutes”.
Scott Pelley is simply pathetic. A shame on journalism. https://t.co/jbwn0uwwzd
– Billmadden1954 (@ bmadden1954) May 5, 2025
Scott Pelley is simply pathetic. A shame on journalism. https://t.co/jbwn0uwwzd
– Billmadden1954 (@ bmadden1954) May 5, 2025
60 minutes have been compromised for years. This is the last episode to prove it. THANKS @Billoreilly To check them. https://t.co/k7q9fqduvx
– Paul Tashner (@ptashner) May 5, 2025
The verification of “60 minutes” facts could be a full -time job.
